virtual currencies searches

In response, you can hold shares, but it is not suitable for chasing up. Remember! Never!Today, my specific operation is as follows:Secondly, the status of the stock market has obviously risen, but the last 500 billion swap facility+300 billion loan repurchase just pulled the index to 3509 points. This time, the expectation lies in the medium and long term. In addition to fighting chicken blood in the short term, it is not as effective as the substantial payment in early November. Don't rush to chase after it.

Hang Seng Index futures closed early, so the feedback was not the actual situation. The A50 futures index exploded by more than 4 points at the end of the session, and the night market rose by 0.84%, so today it depends entirely on the opening of A shares. If it exceeds 3,500 points, the benefits will be directly digested. Once the funds can't keep up, it should be a high probability event to open higher and go lower.4. For the first time, the extraordinary countercyclical adjustment was put forward, and it was clearly named for the first time to stabilize the stock market and the property market. There are several points that we should treat dialectically:

On November 8, I suggested that the reason for lightening the position was that if it continued to rise here, there would be a technical deviation at the daily level after closing at 3489.78 points. The same is true of the pressure now. As long as it closes at 3470.66 points today, it will form a technical deviation.To put it simply, if you open higher and go higher today, there may be another stage high point in the short term, which may not be too friendly for the promotion of the market outlook. At least before the daily deviation is digested, it is a hidden dark mine, and then the fluctuation will be relatively large.4. For the first time, the extraordinary countercyclical adjustment was put forward, and it was clearly named for the first time to stabilize the stock market and the property market. There are several points that we should treat dialectically: